Our services that we provide

Moldova remains one of jurisdictions in Eastern Europe where the mechanism for recognising foreign arbitral awards is formally considered to be fairly predictable; however, in practice, much depends on the quality of the documentation, the soundness of the procedural strategy and an understanding of local case law.

ELI Lithuania handles international disputes, corporate projects and services relating to the cross-border enforcement of judgments; consequently, the issue of enforcing foreign arbitral awards in Moldova regularly arises for clients involved in supply contracts, investments, construction contracts and international trade.

Moldova’s general approach to foreign arbitration

Moldova has joined the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. This allows an arbitration decision made abroad to be acknowledged and enforced in the country if the required conditions are satisfied. In practice, courts in Moldova usually rely on the rules of this Convention when making their rulings. They also use the Moldovan Civil Procedure Code, national arbitration legislation, and any applicable international agreements to which Moldova is a signatory.

The regulatory framework itself largely mirrors the approach adopted in other European countries. The court does not revisit the underlying conflict or evaluate the business merits of the matter. Its main role is to check whether procedural rules have been followed and whether any legal reasons exist to deny recognition. For foreign companies, this provides a relatively effective mechanism for recovering debts, damages, fines and other liabilities from counterparties registered in Moldova or holding assets within its territory.

The significance of the New York Convention

The New York Convention is still one of the main global instruments governing the acknowledgment of arbitral decisions. This treaty establishes the basic framework for how an award issued abroad can be executed in a different jurisdiction. For Moldova, using this treaty brings a number of significant consequences. Firstly, the courts are obliged to recognise foreign arbitral awards unless there are grounds for refusal. Secondly, the list of grounds for refusal is limited. Thirdly, a Moldovan court is not entitled to review the merits of the case.

In real-world use, this is especially significant for cross-border commercial activity. If a dispute has already been heard by an arbitral tribunal, a party should not have to go through a full court proceeding in Moldova again. However, formal compliance with the procedure remains of critical importance. Even if the creditor is in a strong position, errors in the documentation, translations, apostilles or the verification of representatives’ powers of attorney can significantly delay the process.

Competent courts and jurisdiction in Moldova

Applications for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Moldova are considered by the competent Moldovan courts of general jurisdiction under civil procedure rules. In practice, jurisdiction is determined by the debtor’s domicile, registered seat, or the location of assets against which enforcement is sought.

As a general rule, such applications are most commonly examined by the courts located in Chișinău, since a significant number of commercial entities are registered there and many enforcement-related assets are concentrated in the capital. However, jurisdiction is not formally limited to Chișinău and may vary depending on the specific circumstances of the case. The court examines the application within the framework of a special procedure for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. Once the award is recognised and declared enforceable, enforcement proceedings are initiated through enforcement officers (bailiffs), who are responsible for applying coercive measures against the debtor’s assets. Appeals against the court’s decision may be submitted to the higher courts in accordance with the Moldovan Civil Procedure Code.

The authorized judicial authority in Moldova

Submissions presented to judicial authorities in Moldova requesting validation and execution of arbitration decisions rendered in foreign jurisdictions are reviewed by the relevant national courts through a distinct civil procedural framework. Jurisdiction is determined based on factors such as the debtor’s place of residence, registered seat, or the location of assets. In practice, such cases are often handled by courts in Chișinău, as many corporate entities are registered there and a significant portion of assets are located in the capital. However, jurisdiction may vary depending on the specific circumstances of the case.

Once the arbitral award has been recognised and declared enforceable, the creditor may initiate enforcement proceedings through enforcement officers (bailiffs), who are responsible for applying coercive measures against the debtor’s assets.

Grounds for refusal

The reasons on which Moldovan courts may decline to acknowledge or enforce arbitral rulings issued abroad are, in essence, aligned with the standards set out in the New York Convention. A Moldovan court may refuse recognition or enforcement in several situations. These include cases where one of the parties to the arbitration agreement lacked legal capacity to conclude it, or where the arbitration agreement is invalid or ineffective. Refusal may also occur if the respondent was not properly notified of the arbitration proceedings or was otherwise unable to present its case.

Further grounds include situations where the arbitral tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by deciding on matters not submitted to arbitration, or where the tribunal was not properly constituted or the procedure did not comply with the parties’ agreement or applicable law. Recognition may also be refused if the award has not yet become binding or has been set aside in the country of origin.

Finally, recognition and enforcement may be refused on public policy grounds. The public policy exception is often the most debated ground. However, Moldovan courts generally interpret it narrowly. The mere fact that a Moldovan party has lost the dispute or that a significant amount of damages has been awarded is not, in itself, considered a violation of public policy.

The practice of Moldovan courts

In recent years, Moldova’s practice has generally demonstrated a willingness to recognise foreign arbitral awards. The courts follow international standards and endeavour not to interfere with the review of the merits of a commercial dispute. However, this is not a fully automatic process. If the debtor constructs a sound procedural defence, the case can become quite complex. This is particularly true of disputes involving political or corporate conflicts, as well as cases relating to significant assets. The quality of the creditor’s case preparation is of particular importance. A purely formal approach and an attempt to limit oneself to submitting only a basic application often lead to additional risks.

Practical support and guidance

Issues connected with acknowledging and carrying out arbitral rulings issued abroad demand not only strong legal knowledge but also careful and detailed procedural effort. At every stage – from preparing the documentation to liaising with bailiffs – there are details that directly impact the outcome. Errors at an early stage often lead to delays and additional costs. Our team provides comprehensive support for such projects. Our team studies the arbitral decision together with the arbitration agreement, assesses the risks that the ruling may not be carried out, develops a procedural legal strategy, organizes translation and official certification of documents, represents clients in Moldovan courts, and oversees the execution stage of the decision. Where necessary, we undertake asset tracing and work with cross-border structures.

ELI Lithuania handles international disputes and corporate projects, including cases where enforcement of judgments is required across multiple jurisdictions. This enables the firm to develop a unified enforcement strategy, rather than addressing the issue piecemeal, without taking into account the movement of assets or the debtor’s behaviour. If you are considering the validation and execution of a foreign arbitration award in Moldova, and need to assess the likelihood of successful implementation or the practical recovery of funds, you may contact us for guidance and assistance. We can assist both during the preparatory stages of arbitration.

FAQ

On what grounds may a court refuse to recognise an award?

Grounds for refusal are limited. These situations include cases where the agreement to resolve disputes through arbitration is not legally valid, where a party did not receive proper notification, where the arbitration process was not correctly followed, or where the result conflicts with the public policy of Moldova.

How long does the recognition procedure take?

The overall duration is determined by the degree of difficulty of the matter, the debtor’s circumstances, and how complete the supporting documentation is. If the claim is not actively contested, the procedure can be completed relatively quickly. If there are procedural disputes, the timeframe is extended.